(por Jason Adkins y Charles Samuelson)
Junio 3, 2015
Este verano se celebra el 50 aniversario de la aprobación de la Ley de Derecho al Voto. Cuando el Congreso aprobó esta legislación histórica en 1965 todos los miembros de la delegación de Minnesota, which included both Democrats and Republicans, voted for it. That fact speaks strongly to Minnesota’s value of supporting a strong, engaged and fair electorate — a value that transcends party lines.
Minnesota leaders in both parties now have a chance to show that they can come together and uphold this ideal, by passing voting rights restoration during the upcoming special session of the Minnesota Legislature.
Promotes public safety and community engagement
This legislation would restore the vote to approximately 47,000 Minnesotans who live in our communities but still cannot vote because of a prior felony conviction. It has strong bipartisan authorship and support, y a diverse statewide coalition of more than 70 organizations, including public safety organizations, service providers, faith communities, and community engagement groups, entre otros.
The Restore the Vote coalition believes that once we decide as a community that it is in the public’s best interest for an ex-offender to be living and working in the community and rebuilding his or her life, there is no good reason why that person should not have a voice in our democracy. When people have the opportunity to vote, they feel as though they are a part of their communities, and have a true stake in society.
As many ex-offenders can attest, the opportunity for positive civic engagement removes one more barrier to re-entering society. Research also shows that such opportunities may reduce recidivism and foster increased civic participation in children of felon offenders.
Change will create a much clearer rule
Public officials believe that this change will also conserve public resources. Current law is confusing, and this change will create a much clearer rule about who can vote, which would save valuable law enforcement resources and make it simpler for all Minnesotans to engage in our state’s democracy.
Those opposing this change believe that losing the right to vote is just one consequence of committing a felony. We agree that we must insist on accepting responsibility and paying the consequences for crimes, but we should not simply punish for punishment’s sake. We should also work to rehabilitate people and allow them to be a positive example for their children.
Our friends, neighbors and family members who commit crimes are expected to come out of incarceration and contribute to society, but continuing to have criminal justice policies that undermine that goal is counterproductive.