Equal Rights Amendment
The Equal Rights Amendment, more appropriately called the “Erosion of Rights Amendment,” would diminish the hard-earned rights and protections of women and could eliminate conscience rights and religious liberty of all Minnesotans.
The 2026 bill language goes beyond attempting to protect “sex” as a class, but rather would protect people based on their “gender identity or expression.” This would undo years of hard-fought women’s rights victories, and if passed by legislators, would be sent to Minnesota voters during a general election.
Help us stop this legislation in its tracks and instead protect women, girls, and our religious liberty!
How would the ERA get added the Constitution?
-
- The legislature introduces an act proposing a change in the Constitution.
- The act must be approved by a majority vote in both the Senate and the House.
- Once the proposed amendment is passed, it is placed on a general election ballot.
- It does not require the governor’s signature or veto like a normal bill.
- Amendments are ratified if approved by a majority of those who vote in the election.
In the case of the ERA, since it only needs to pass the House, the legislators could take it up for a vote any day after the legislative session begins on February 12. It does not need to go through any more committees, so a simple majority vote could pass it and send it to our ballots.
What MCC has done on this issue in recent years
-
Statements and Testimony:
- Verbal Testimony in Opposition to the ERA (SF473) Delivered by Maggee Hangge, Minnesota Catholic Conference, 2026
- Written Testimony in Opposition to the Equal Rights Amendment, 2025
- Testimony in Opposition to S.F. 37 - ERA, 2024
- Testimony in Opposition to S.F. 37 (Kunesh) (Constitutional amendment providing for equality under the law), 2023
- Supplement to Testimony in Opposition to H.F. 726 (Bahner) Gender Equality Provided Under the Law, 2022
- Testimony in Opposition to H.F. 726 (Bahner) (Equal Rights Amendment), 2022
- Columns & Media Coverage